(0) Obligation:

Clauses:

even(0).
even(s(s(0))).
even(s(s(s(X)))) :- odd(X).
odd(s(0)).
odd(s(X)) :- even(s(s(X))).

Query: even(g)

(1) PrologToDTProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)

Built DT problem from termination graph DT10.

(2) Obligation:

Triples:

evenA(s(s(s(s(X1))))) :- evenA(s(s(X1))).

Clauses:

evencA(0).
evencA(s(s(0))).
evencA(s(s(s(s(0))))).
evencA(s(s(s(s(X1))))) :- evencA(s(s(X1))).

Afs:

evenA(x1)  =  evenA(x1)

(3) TriplesToPiDPProof (SOUND transformation)

We use the technique of [DT09]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
evenA_in: (b)
Transforming TRIPLES into the following Term Rewriting System:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → U1_G(X1, evenA_in_g(s(s(X1))))
EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))

R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiDP implies Termination of TRIPLES

(4) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → U1_G(X1, evenA_in_g(s(s(X1))))
EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))

R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(6) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))

R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(7) PiDPToQDPProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(10) YES