(0) Obligation:
Clauses:
even(0).
even(s(s(0))).
even(s(s(s(X)))) :- odd(X).
odd(s(0)).
odd(s(X)) :- even(s(s(X))).
Query: even(g)
(1) PrologToDTProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)
Built DT problem from termination graph DT10.
(2) Obligation:
Triples:
evenA(s(s(s(s(X1))))) :- evenA(s(s(X1))).
Clauses:
evencA(0).
evencA(s(s(0))).
evencA(s(s(s(s(0))))).
evencA(s(s(s(s(X1))))) :- evencA(s(s(X1))).
Afs:
evenA(x1) = evenA(x1)
(3) TriplesToPiDPProof (SOUND transformation)
We use the technique of [DT09]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
evenA_in: (b)
Transforming
TRIPLES into the following
Term Rewriting System:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → U1_G(X1, evenA_in_g(s(s(X1))))
EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))
R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiDP implies Termination of TRIPLES
(4) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → U1_G(X1, evenA_in_g(s(s(X1))))
EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))
R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
(6) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))
R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(7) PiDPToQDPProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.
(8) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(9) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- EVENA_IN_G(s(s(s(s(X1))))) → EVENA_IN_G(s(s(X1)))
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
(10) YES